Sorry you are very misinformed if you think that "almost all ebay listings" have no return priviledges in the case of gross errors in the listing. If that were true then there would be no ebay. The whole reason ebay works is the sellers are obligated to deliver what they list, they cant just ship whatever they feel like shipping and leave the buyers with no recourse. JCO
-----Original Message----- From: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 7:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: K15/3.5 (was Re: ok, who got it?) that's still better than no such privilege at all. whch seems to be the case with almost all ebay listings. and there are *very few* people who would agree to refund the whole payment (bid + s/h). otoh, if an item is clearly misrepresented (mis-advertised), you can (in a long and painful process) get most of your money back from ebay, without seller's cooperation at all. i know, i did once, a few year ago. but, imo, the price is (way) too high, no matter what. perhaps the buyer just wanted the lens that much :) best, mishka On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:05:26 -0500, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know about the K versions but the 15mm SMCTs have all been > selling for over a $1000 lately on ebay. One thing I do not like on > this listing is the > seller expects you to pay shipping and insurance costs for the privilige > of > returning his mis-adverstised items. That's absurd if the error is gross > and on > the part of the seller. Wheres the incentive for him to list it > correctly if > the buyer pays the price for his mistakes? > JCO > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:54 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: K15/3.5 (was Re: ok, who got it?) > > AL version? What's that? I didn't think the K15/3.5 was all that > rare to warrant so high a price as this one sold for. Is this a > reasonable price for a K15/3.5? Wasn't there a SMC Tak 15/3.5 as > well? I'd like to learn more about the various iterations of this > lens. Anybody an expert on these puppies? > > Shel > > > [Original Message] > > From: Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Dunno, but I wonder who got this one: > > > > http://tinyurl.com/547s5 > > > > I wonder if someone determined this was the AL version? According > > to Boz/Dario, only 100 were made. > >
