On Thu, 31 May 2001 02:44:42 -0700, Jim wrote:
> Shot one was a blurry mess, obviously taken by the owner's cousin or
> something. I've thrown better pictures I've taken into the trash, knowing
> they weren't any good.
> Shot two was really cool, and I enjoyed the third shot very much as well.
> Mr. Mann, you wuz ROBBED!
> > You can check out the images here:
> > 1st place: http://www.photo.co.nz/photo/photo_comp/may01/dog.htm
> > 2nd place: http://www.photo.co.nz/photo/photo_comp/may01/pond.htm
> > 3rd place: http://www.photo.co.nz/photo/photo_comp/may01/bikes.htm
The first one "feels like" it was shot as digital. It has all the
hallmarks of the few times I've used digital cameras (always cheap
ones), including a slow "shutter speed" even in bright light and
noticeable color shifts where movement occurred during exposure ... or
that's what it seems like to me, anyway. And I concur, David was
robbed.
TTYL, DougF
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
