VG+ is not bad and these ratings are subjective...
Use it for a while and after a month or two if it's not good ask for a
refund, you have three months to give (bad) feedback and someone who has
100% positive will not want a negative. You could also ask for a small
refund, like 10% or 20% because the item is not exactly as described.

I bought a SFX camera that does work at all and a A 50mm F1.7 lens dirty
and with no balls...

On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 17:06, Graywolf wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I bought the following via BIN on eBay. It is not in my opinion in the 
> condition described. I would rate it as vg+ to ex-. I certainly looks ex+ in 
> the photo and as you can see was described as in perfect condition. Also he 
> did not box it but shipped it in a padded envelop (These do tend to be 
> somewhat delicate), despite the fact that for Priority Mail the PO will 
> provide free boxes.
> 
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7521363779&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWN%3AIT&rd=1
> 
> Normally I would send it back demanding a 100% refund. However, I am under 
> some constraints timewise and financialwise. I basically want to have it for 
> the GFM Camera Clinic, but being poor, poor, poor I can only afford the 
> holder this month and to order the film next month, so I can not even test 
> the thing until then.
> 
> The guy has 70+ positives and no negatives so I thought I could trust the 
> description and thus used the BIN although I figured I could save quite a bit 
> by bidding until I got one at my price. I guess what is bothering me most is 
> this "not as described" thing happening more and more often. Sure I can 
> probably negotiate with him and get my money back or a partial refund in 
> return for giving him positive feedback, but I am feeling that is 
> self-serving and does not help in the end as we see more and more of this.
> 
> So I am asking for opinions about what I should do. How do you guys look at 
> this kind of thing?
> 
>  
> -- 
> 
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> -----------------------------------
> 

Reply via email to