Is anyone happy using Adobe Elements 4 and Adobe Raw converter?
What about RawShooter?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 5:38 AM
Subject: RE: Which RAW converter?
Why are only "As Shot" or "Manual" usable? Is the color temp slider
unavailable? That gives you far more precise control. What about the
other settings in the drop down menu, like cloudy, fluorescent, and so on?
Are they unavailable to you? If the settings show in the menu, in what
way
are the useless? With which program are you trying to use the RAW
converter - Photoshop CS2 or the latest releases of Elements.
There seems to be a consensus that the Adobe converter is far superior to
the Pentax converter. You've seen first hand how the two compare.
Somehow I think your missing something in the way you set up the Adobe
converter. However, I've not tried the new Beta version, just 2.4, so I'm
assuming the color temp menus and sliders are quite similar or the same in
the way they work
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
[Original Message]
From: Jack Isidore
I can't decide which RAW converter is the best. I have tried the
latest Adobe beta and Pentax.
Adobe has more options like noise and color fringing reduction. The
white balance settings drive me nuts. Only "As Shot" or Manual are
usable. Adobe RAW would be nice since it allows me to convert PEF to
DNG and save disc space.
The Pentax RAW converter displays the best white balance settings. The
white balance settings are identical (I think) to the camera settings.
the bad thing about the Pentax converter is remaining color noise and
ugly artefact's on color borders/edges.
