The poster removed the information soon after it was posted. I don't believe that Wiki's peer review is all that good. Nor do the Wikiups <LOL> as thay've admitted to the flaws and are now starting to make changes. Sorry Rob, you cannot, at this time, convince me that Wiki should be taken seriously wrt repoorting Tom Cruise's actions and behavior and similar such stories. Much of that stuff is subjective to begin with.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Rob Studdert > > Believe none of what you hear, half of what you read, and most of what you > > see ... > > > > The fact that someone on this list posted a bullshit entry to Wikipedia > > (something about Theriaultian photography, IIRC) makes me very skeptical of > > anything I read in Wikipedia. > > And how long did it last after is was subjected to review (it's in the history > but I couldn't be bothered searching for it)? Articles must pass a peer review > system and for each article there is also a public discussion list. If a > currently published article is in doubt, needs more information or professional > review there will be a notification as such at the head of the article. > > The Tom Cruise entry has been amended thousands of times and hopefully will > continue to be added to and corrected for accuracy.
