On 8 Mar 2006 at 16:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I owned one Sigma lens, the 17-35. It was one of their high-end models with > all those extra letters in its name. It was a turd. I sold it and replaced it > with the DA 16-45. No comparison. I went from shit to sugar.
Interesting, compared to all my other lenses my recently acquired DA 16-45 feels like utter crap, I couldn't imagine a lens feeling less vulnerable and loose. The fact that the frame bounces around as any control is adjusted due to the obvious barrel slop is disconcerting to say the least. Experience is relative. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
