mike wilson wrote: > > > > > From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 2006/05/01 Mon PM 10:35:02 GMT > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Paying to shoot in US National Parks > > > > Shoot for yourself is free. A commercial shoot is supposed to have a > > permit which my or may not cost something (depends upon the park, the > > ranger who gives you permission, and how President Bush's corns are > > doing). I one the other hand get in free. > > > > graywolf > > http://www.graywolfphoto.com > > http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf > > "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" > > ----------------------------------- > > Most Britons (maybe mainland Europeans as well?) will find it amusing that > you (generic you) are getting rather exercised about the idea of being > charged for photography when you have to _pay to get into_ your "National" > Parks.... >
but at least once you hit age 65 it IS free. ann (gets in free)
