> > From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/05/01 Mon PM 07:31:03 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Paying to shoot in US National Parks > > mike wilson wrote: > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:08:40 US/Eastern > >>To: [email protected] > >>Subject: Paying to shoot in US National Parks > >> > >> Topic has started on another list i'm on, but no definitive > >> answer.. > >> > >>For those that frequent the parks, do you pay as an amature photographer, > >>or is this > >>something more > >>for the on location film shoot people, using models etc.. > >> > >>I know up here we don't have to pay. > >> > > > > > > It's only a matter of time. In the UK, the national organisation that > > looks after much of the building heritage has banned indoor photography for > > the last decade or so. Partly for "security" and partly to make you buy > > the guidebooks and postcards. The same will happen in National Parks, > > although it will be more difficult to enforce. It's their land so they > > make the rules. > > > > m > > > > Cell Phone Cameras will kill off that sort of ban. Can't stop them, > images are acceptable and Rent-a-Cops can't tell when they're being used. >
A few high profile cases, plus making it illegal to show images that have not been properly sanctioned (paid for) will make people rather cautious. > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
