> > From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/05/01 Mon PM 10:35:02 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Paying to shoot in US National Parks > > Shoot for yourself is free. A commercial shoot is supposed to have a > permit which my or may not cost something (depends upon the park, the > ranger who gives you permission, and how President Bush's corns are > doing). I one the other hand get in free. > > graywolf > http://www.graywolfphoto.com > http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf > "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" > -----------------------------------
Most Britons (maybe mainland Europeans as well?) will find it amusing that you (generic you) are getting rather exercised about the idea of being charged for photography when you have to _pay to get into_ your "National" Parks.... > > > Kenneth Waller wrote: > > I've never paid anything more than admission to all the national parks > > I've visited. > > > > Kenneth Waller > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Paying to shoot in US National Parks > > > > > >> Topic has started on another list i'm on, but no definitive > >> answer.. > >> > >> For those that frequent the parks, do you pay as an amature > >> photographer, or is this > >> something more > >> for the on location film shoot people, using models etc.. > >> > >> I know up here we don't have to pay. > >> > >> Dave > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
