>On May 16, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Cotty wrote: > >> BTW we had MF for our wedding ;-) > >Even for the candids?
Nahhh. > >In doing fifteen years of high end lab work, I saw very, very few >photographers do the candids on MF. Mostly it was MF for the groups, >bride and groom portraits and some key church images, with the candids >all on 35mm. Agreed. But getting back to AF, surely for candids a fast AF and a 70-200 on a good quality sensor and you can't go wrong. Well, you can but that's a whole different kettle of discombobulations. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
