You may find faining misunderstanding easier than defending your work. If so, enough said.
Jack --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I don't understand what you mean ... I often don't understand > your > comments, jack. "Film over the image?" What are you trying to say? > Lack > of contrast? Muddy? Colors of low saturation? Not bright enough? > Not > sharp enough? What do you mean by "check the mugger person's mocha?" > Is > that a joke, or do you mean something more? Sorry Jack, you're not > being > precise enough for me to understand you. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Jack Davis > > > I'm certain you "understand" the words. Your point has to be that > you > > just don't agree with them. Right? > > > > Jack > > > > --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I don't understand your comments, but thank you for commenting. > > > > > > Shel > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Original Message] > > > > From: Jack Davis > > > > > > > Honestly appears to have a sort of film over the image. > > > > Makes me want to clean my glasses. > > > > Best check the mugger person's mocha. > > > > > > istDS, A50/1.4 @ F/2.8, ISO 3200, 1/40 sec > > > http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/zocalao.html > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
