Maybe you need a new computer. The real question might be how much larger would the K10D be if it used CF cards. You can't really compare the D and the K10D as they have a different set of features and design. Or, another way of looking at it might be to consider how much smaller the D would be if it used an SD card.
You say the decision to use SD cards in the K10D is "98% marketing." Where did you get that figure? I suspect you just made it up or pulled it from thin air. Shel > [Original Message] > From: graywolf > That does not compute. The *istD is smaller than the K10D, yet has a CF > card. If you think CF or CF & SD would have made the camera larger you > are most likely wrong. The decision was 98% marketing, millions of > folks already have an SD card for their phone. Luddites and pros who > want CF can buy something else, after all they are only a small > percentage of the market. But I guess it is good they are standardizing > a bit. Better than having a CF in the laptop, an SD in the Pocket > Computer, and a XD in the camera. But wait? The camera and the pocket > computer also take CF's. So much for that theory <grin>. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
