Op Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:56:41 +0200 schreef Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am considering selling my MF ( 6x6) gear to help finance the K10D. > Does the new 10MP camera with 22 bit colour depth mean it's time to ditch > the 120-roll film equipment? > Can I get the same image quality and resolution with the K10D? Isn't that hard to tell without K10D examples? Or did I miss them? > PS: > I three years time the K10D will have lost as much value (close to all of > it) as I have saved (cost of 120 film, development etc.) - during the > same > period of time. > I other words - there's really no economical gain in switching to > digital - > over a relative short period of time. Over a longer period there isn't > either - because digital cameras get obsolete in 3-4 years Eventually > I'll > buy a new camera more often, than I had to, using film (film cameras > lasted > 10-20 years) In other words -it's not an economical qestion. It's a > question > of image quality today. Not considering that film/developing options may > disappear anytime soon. This has been true for me since I stopped printing all negatives. The rock-bottom prices for great analogue camera's help as well: I can afford more and better gear. Which does not really help with photography, but is fun :o) -- Regards, Lucas (still eagerly awaiting the 645) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
