Hi! > It's light, it's small, and it's remarkably good for the money. I > didn't like the speed ... f/5.6 maximum aperture at 55mm is just that > little bit too slow for my needs ... but it's a pretty good performer > for the price point. > > The FA20-35/4 AL does a better job for me, its almost a prime > replacement in its focal length range, although it's quite a bit more > expensive.
I've found that on digital the FAJ 18-35 is not bad at all, if not very good. Also, at least to my taste the difference between 18 mm and 20 mm on wide is meaningful. So, at least I would suggest to try the FAJ 18-35 option as well. I've 2/3 through the test film which I shot with FAJ 18-35 past weekend... I'll be sure to report my findings when I finish the roll and have it processed. Thanks. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
