Thanks for the education, all who replied.

I may not be wiser, but I am better informed.

John


On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:48:49 +0100, Digital Image Studio  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 28/09/06, Lucas Rijnders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The obvious solution would be to do away with these cavities, and have  
>> the
>> photosensitive part of the sensor flush with the surface. Apparently  
>> this
>> is not feasible or desireable. Does anyone know why?
>
> Very very basically, there has to be depth to the photo sensor, that's
> the nature of current sensor technology and if they removed the
> condenser lens then the sensitivity would fall as not all of the pixel
> area is light sensitive. They can however offset the condenser lenses
> (as they have done in the case of the Leica M8 sensor) in order to
> provide a compromise response between rays that hit the sensor
> perpendicularly and those at the most acute angle.
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to