No, it's not. A Coke is NOT Pepsi. They are different formulas and taste different. When I order a Coke, I don't want a Pepsi. The converse is also true. Try telling Coke that it's the same as Pepsi. If you tell me Coke, I expect Coke, not Pepsi.
If you want to argue minutia, make a good solid argument, not this specious soft drink crap. Next you'll be telling us that a 7-up is the same as a Sprite, and that Budweiser is a Corona, and a Land Rover is a Jeep (Don't let Daimler-Chrysler catch you ... they are very protective of their trademark name). Shel > > [Original Message] > > From: J. C. O'Connell > > It's like ordering a Coke when all they sell is > > Pepsi, everybody knows what I am talking about > > except possibly you, actually, scratch that, you > > knew, you just want to argue over nothing. Since > > the term IS came first, its more like a COKE than > > a pepsi (pentax) . These are just different trade names > > for the same damn thing, the image/sensor is moved to > > compensate for camera movements to reduce blur... > > What does Konica-Minolta call theirs? It's the same > > technique as Pentax is currently using....If you dont like my > > terminology > > fine, but sometimes the generic term is the more appropriate > > term to use. And in the case of Pentax, they are only > > using one technique so there can be no confusion when > > reffering to their version of "IS". -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
