Yes, that's what I've found in my experiments this morning. I'm not going to print it at 40 inches. It would be only 5.5 inches high. Instead I'm cutting it into four pieces and making four 18 x 10.6 prints. I'll mat and frame each one individually. Hung together, it will still make a nice display. It's a wedding present for friends, so I want it to be nice. It's a pic of the lake where they lived and fell in love, a panorama of the entire shoreline. My friends are leaving town now, so I want them to be able to take the lake with them. (Some of you may remember the woman. She's my favorite ex-model, Amy.) Paul On Dec 2, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
> > On Dec 2, 2006, at 7:03 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: > >>> That's what I'm thinking. I'll try printing tomorrow. It will >>> probably >>> take four or five hours to make an 87 inch print. >> >> Without a third-party RIP, the Epson 2200 won't print longer than 40 >> inches. (Or at least it isn't *supposed* to.) > > That's correct. I talked to some Epson people about this arbitrary > length limit and they knew of no way to get around it. > > Bob > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
