well I can't help that. I've been as plain as I can be, and I've even
provided a drawing.

--
 Bob
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
> Sent: 17 December 2006 18:23
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: K10D review online
> 
> these were yes or no questions, and your first
> answer further confuses me.
> jco
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of
> Bob W
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 12:51 PM
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: K10D review online
> 
> 
> First answer: 
> the conversion to a format that a minilab printer can use.
> 
> Second answer:
> Somebody here has said you can't print Pentax raw files that way. I
> don't have a Pentax digital camera, so I don't know. 
> 
> I have an Olympus digital camera. It says I can print direct from
the
> camera with a minilab printer - I am not talking here about taking
the
> card out and plugging the card into the printer, I am talking about
> plugging the camera into the printer. It doesn't say that 
> this facility
> is limited to jpeg files, so I assume that it will print from raw.
> However, I have not tried it. There is no reason at all (as I have
> explained) why it should not, so I will try and I will let you know.
> 
> --
>  Bob
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
> > Sent: 17 December 2006 14:36
> > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> > Subject: RE: K10D review online
> > 
> > what can be done in the camera? Can you print
> > Pentax RAW files at a minilab from the media
> > card without any user processing on a PC
> > or with the camera or not? (two queations)??
> > jco
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of
> > Bob W
> > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 3:34 AM
> > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> > Subject: RE: K10D review online
> > 
> > 
> > it can all be done in the camera using predefined settings in
> exactly
> > the same way as the conversion to jpeg is done in the camera.
> > 
> > --
> >  Bob
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> 
> > > Of J. C. O'Connell
> > > Sent: 17 December 2006 01:28
> > > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> > > Subject: RE: K10D review online
> > > 
> > > I dont follow you, if you have to do this processing
> > > at home with special ACR or Pentax sofware to open and
> > print the RAW
> > > files, then its not as "portable" or "universal" a format
> > as jpeg is
> > > which you can print directly from the media card at
> > minilabs, no? that
> > 
> > > would seem to be a major feature of "shooting jpeg" if 
> thats all you
> 
> > > want or need. jco
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> 
> > > Of Bob W
> > > Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 4:15 PM
> > > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> > > Subject: RE: K10D review online
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I don't know what the purpose of the jpeg option is. As far
> > as I can
> > > see, the only benefit of it is to store more pictures on the
card.
> > > 
> > > It is no more difficult to plug the camera into a printer 
> and print 
> > > from raw files. You can get usable results. Results that are at
> > > least as good
> > > as jpeg. 
> > > 
> > > To the best of my knowledge there are no intrinsic
> > properties of raw
> > > files that force anybody to do any post-processing at all. All
of
> > the
> > > pictures that I have had from my Olympus, for example, have been
> > > perfectly usable without post-processing. Of course, this
doesn't
> > mean
> > > they are exhibition standard. But nor are jpegs under the same
> > > circumstances.
> > > 
> > > You can do an experiment and judge for yourself rather 
> than take my 
> > > word for it. Borrow a digital camera, shoot some raw, some jpeg,
> > > and get some
> > > prints.
> > > 
> > > If you think about the processes that are going on, it must be
> true.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Suppose you decide that you are going to 'shoot jpeg', which
only 
> > > means you're going to store jpeg. You make an exposure which the

> > > sensor records. The software reads the data from the sensor, 
> > > converts it
> to
> > > jpeg on the fly and stores the results.
> > > 
> > > When you walk up to the printer and plug the camera in, 
> the software
> 
> > > in the camera reads the jpeg file and converts it into the
> > > format that the
> > > printer understands.
> > > 
> > > If you decide to shoot raw, then when you make an exposure the 
> > > software reads the data from the sensor and stores it without 
> > > converting it
> > to
> > > jpeg.
> > > 
> > > When you walk up to the printer and plug the camera in, 
> the software
> 
> > > in the camera reads the raw file and converts it into the format

> > > that
> > the
> > > printer understands.
> > > 
> > > There is no reason at all why the same algorithm that makes jpeg

> > > results USABLE, as you put it, wouldn't be used on the
conversion 
> > > from raw
> > to
> > > the printer format, since both processes start from the 
> same place, 
> > > and end up in the same place.
> > > 
> > > --
> > >  Bob
> > >  
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > 
> > > > Of J. C. O'Connell
> > > > Sent: 16 December 2006 20:45
> > > > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> > > > Subject: RE: K10D review online
> > > > 
> > > > But isnt the purpose of using the jpeg output
> > > > option of the camera so you can just go
> > > > straight to a print lab and print the jpegs
> > > > without having to do any digital processing
> > > > of the images on a PC or laptop? It sounds
> > > > like you cant do RAW and get instant **USABLE**
> > > > results which is what I meant.
> > > > jco
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to