Isnt owning a world class HD home theater worth way more than owning a K10D? (excepting if you are a full time pro photographer and need one to earn a living), I think it certainly is. How much use do you get of each during the life of the product? I spend way more time watching home theater than I do using cameras. If I had to take only one or the other, they K10D ( or ALL my cameras! ) would go without a second thought. I just couldn't live without HD home theater now. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boris Liberman Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 2:00 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT Hi! > I applaud Graywolf's economical choice, but I disagree with Adam's > evaluation of HDTV. I have a 61 inch Pioneer plasma on the wall. > There's a lot of HD broadcast these days. Most of the time I'm > getting at least 15 HD channels over Direct TV. Today, with football > and the Superfan package, I'm getting all the NFL games in HD. I'm > watching the Bears of course. But the difference between HD and SD is > substantial. No, it's more than substantial. It's like the difference > between a 2 megapixel point and shoot and a 10 megapixel DSLR. No > comparison. I haven't gone for HD DVD in either format yet. I'll wait > until it's affordable. But like JCO said, standard DVDs upsampled to > 1080i are far better than the same played in low resolution. Let me see, 61 inches... It is more than meter and a half across... Mister Stenquist, you thereby attain the title of the most diagonal of all people whom I have in acquaintance. ;-) I am starting to think about 32 inches of LCD screen, but even this small it will cost me more than brand new K10D ;-). Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
