GM claims they will have a zero emissions car on the road by 2010. In a conversation with another list member awhile ago, I commented that while the vehicle produced no emissions that did not say anything about the infrastructure that provided the power. Probably coal fired electric plants. And that says everything about what I think of all you pseudo environmentalists. You ain't go a clue about the total systems impact.
I remember animal rights activists wearing leather coats, 2-1/2 ton 8 liter cars with anti-nuke stickers, laws requiring holding tanks on boats while cities dumped raw sewage in the same waters, farmers spending big bucks on expensive smudge pots and turning the tires they had been burning over to the state that disposed of them by burning, recycling paper that caused ten times the environmental damage that new paper did. To me environmentalist and hypocrite seem to be synonyms. By the way you can recycle your old jazz LP's by sending them to me. I am also looking for a turntable that will go well with my 1979 (silver) HH Scott receiver. And, when you are drinking your beer out of a glass you do not know exactly how much you have consumed. I am sure I am going to regret this in the morning... Christian wrote: > John Francis wrote: > >>> Ah yes, the Tesla http://www.teslamotors.com/ >>> >>> Now, if Detroit would just embrace this kind of technology, we could >>> have a fully electric car that costs less than US$100k... Too bad they >>> are in so deep with Big Oil >> Well, Detroit might not be interested, but Lotus are - they seem >> to be planning to market the Tesla. >> >> > > I believe Lotus is actually building the thing. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
