On Dec 29, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > I can't imagine why the 645D wouldn't surface. It's in the pipeline, > and a lot of well-connected people consider it a foregone conclusion. > Pentax now has more resources than they ever did. This camera will > make a statement. I know from your past comments that you weren't > expecting a camera with K10D specs for $900 either. We'll see a 22 > megapixel 645D for $5000. Of course you will then say that because > it's underpriced, it's the death knoll of Pentax. Your bleak outlook > grows weary at times.
I don't really want to get into yet another senseless war of baseless opinions, but I do hope that the Pentax 645D is produced and delivers at a price I can grope at. The fine gentleman who gifted me the pleasure of working with the Pentax 645 has me salivating to acquire a few of the fine lenses and hoping for a digital body. Much as I like working with the 645 film camera and it's beautiful negatives, scanning film is simply too slow and tedious for me to want to do much of it anymore. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
