John Whittingham wrote: >> LOL, I sold my A 24f/2.8, bought on FA24/2 wasn't happy, bought >> another, so then I had two, still wasn't happy, sold both FA24/2, >> bought another A 24f/2.8, mostly happy now. I still don't understand >> why the FA24/2 often gets such rave reviews. > > > I'm on my second FA 24/2, wasn't happy with the first one, didn't get on with > the A 24/2.8, too soft until f/5.6 and beyond, kept my K 24/2.8 for > sentimental reasons but it's no better han the A. > > At the risk of upsetting a lot of people the manual focus Smegma 24/2.8 > Superwide II is the best bang for the buck, it's usuable wide open on the > *ist D, little vignetting on film SLR's until f/4, my A 24/2.8 could only > just match it by F/8 and then just. > > The FA24/2, awesome from f/5.6 - F/11 > > John
Got the Sigma in AI-S form. Not selling it, great glass even if the handling sucks (On my example the rubber focus ring is departing and the aperture ring is balky) -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
