What? ;-)

Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: Amazon buys dpreview.com


>I usually don't get point across very well in one sentence posts, in case
> you haven't noticed. :-)
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>>From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>Subject: Re: Amazon buys dpreview.com
>>Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:49:05 -0700
>>
>>I think it is how you stated it - you have clarified it much better
>>here.  I understood you to say that DPReview is less biased than PDML
>>- which is plainly obvious - as it should be.  It didn't read like you
>>were complaining about the misinformation remark.
>>
>>I think the misinformation on DPReview stems from the forum
>>participants, rather than the site administrators - really much more
>>like a PDML, if you well - just a bunch of different ones.  So you can
>>get any type of misinformation that you want.  The reviews and news
>>are much less biased.
>>
>>--
>>Bruce
>>
>>
>>Monday, May 14, 2007, 4:36:43 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>TC> That's my point. I find dpreview to be among the best sites out there
>>for
>>TC> camera reviews and comparing features. At times some may disagree with
>>the
>>TC> conclusions that are reached, but in terms of kinds of tests, quality
>>of
>>TC> tests, it's far more exhaustive than any of us are with our own
>>cameras.
>>
>>TC> Hence my disagreement about it being a source of misinformation.
>>
>>TC> Tom C.
>>
>>
>> >>From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> >>Subject: Re: Amazon buys dpreview.com
>> >>Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:30:54 -0700
>> >>
>> >>hmmm....a site that caters to all different makes of cameras is less
>> >>biased than a list that caters to a specific single brand...amazing!
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>Bruce
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Monday, May 14, 2007, 4:13:28 PM, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Now where will we go for our misinformation?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Bob
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>TC> I find dpreview less biased than this mailing list.
>> >>
>> >>TC> Tom C.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> >>[email protected]
>> >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>[email protected]
>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.0/804 - Release Date: 14.05.2007 
> 16:46
>
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to