What? Terrorists? Airliners are concerned about the possibility of radio/navigation equipment interference, hence the shielding reference.
That's why every seat on most modern aircraft have built in payphones. Cheers, Dave On 10/14/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it were not for cel-phones that last 9-11 airliner would have hit something > too. It seems sad that the price all those folks paid to save others is now > rewarded by an absolute ban on using them??? > > I would like to make the point that it has been proven over and over that > airlines would not know a terrorist or hijacker if they walked onto one of > their > airplanes. It would be worth putting up with all the BS if it did some good, > but > it is only a show put on by people who are basically incompetent. What we are > dealing with as in almost all these kinds of cases is an authority problem, > sometimes referred to as a God Complex. > > > > Cotty wrote: > > <http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2201081/man-arrested-iphone> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

