Note that the situation with Flight 93 involved inbound calls to passenger cellphones, which the built-in payphones would be useless for.
-Adam David Savage wrote: > What? Terrorists? > > Airliners are concerned about the possibility of radio/navigation > equipment interference, hence the shielding reference. > > That's why every seat on most modern aircraft have built in payphones. > > Cheers, > > Dave > > On 10/14/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If it were not for cel-phones that last 9-11 airliner would have hit >> something >> too. It seems sad that the price all those folks paid to save others is now >> rewarded by an absolute ban on using them??? >> >> I would like to make the point that it has been proven over and over that >> airlines would not know a terrorist or hijacker if they walked onto one of >> their >> airplanes. It would be worth putting up with all the BS if it did some good, >> but >> it is only a show put on by people who are basically incompetent. What we are >> dealing with as in almost all these kinds of cases is an authority problem, >> sometimes referred to as a God Complex. >> >> >> >> Cotty wrote: >>> <http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2201081/man-arrested-iphone> > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
