Mike ... If you mean using digital cameras, well, I'm not particularly interested at this point. Digital cameras don't work properly for much of my photography. However, I do scan some of my work and put it up for all to see, and it's quite possible that, given a good photograph and a good negative and a good scan, I may have a digital print made. Actually, I intend to do just that, and have already contacted a couple of places to get an idea of what's required for a high end print.
Also, although it's a cheap one, I've been using a digital camera longer than it seems you have, albeit for entirely different purposes. Mike Johnston wrote: > But while we're on the subject of changing viewpoints, I think what you (and > Shel and Mafud and Christian etc.) are forgetting is that I was just like > you a year ago. I was saying all the same things, making all the same > arguments. > > Digital is coming to your lives as photographers, just as it came to mine > (whether we also stick with film or not). The only difference between any of > us is WHEN we jump in. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/pow/enter.html http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/cameras/pentax_repair_shops.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
