Hi Boris,

Boris Liberman wrote:

The time to upgrade my home PC has come. My main workflow revolves around LightRoom 2.1 and I intend to keep using LR in the future.

The dilemma is which processor to buy - dual core or quad core. My brother (who happens to be top grade sys admin) suggests that I buy dual core processor because of its low heat generation and low power consumption. He suggests that dual core is optimal balance. However he admits to have no experience with applications such as LR.

Thence the question. Is there any of you who was using dual core and upgraded to quad core and noticed significant LR performance improvements? In general, what do you suggest - dual core or quad core?

The motherboard that I am going to buy will support both dual and quad core so that I could theoretically upgrade in the future should I decided that dual core is not strong enough. But I'd rather optimize this criterion up front.

My experience has been that more and faster memory typically make a bigger difference than the processor, and I'd guess that LR is no different, due in part to the large "undo" cache it needs, like any photo editor. That said, the only place you're likely to see any difference at all between a dual core and a quad core in LR is when you're applying filters/manipulations to an image. It's not going to help with compress/decompress, because those are limited by the disk bandwidth much more than processor or memory bandwidth.

If it were my computer, for these sorts of tasks, I'd start by getting 4GB or more of the fastest memory that my motherboard will support. Then I'd consider increasing the disk bandwidth with either faster drives or RAID or both. Only then would I consider dropping significant cash on a new processor.

Now if I was running big simulations or "SETI at Home" or "Folding at Home" or ray tracing or something, then I'd go for processor. But most people are limited far more by the memory and disk than the CPU.

--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to