Paul, I noticed that the 35 F2 FMC M go for the same price as the 40 F2.8 SMC M.Which of the two would you get first? Is the pancake really that good? Thanks. Bob.
> ---------- > From: Paul Stenquist[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: M lens testimonial > > I agree with Mike on this one. And there are some real bargains among > the M lenses. I'm quite fond of the M 100/2.8, the M 35/2.0, the M 40/ > 2.8 "pancake lens," the M 50/1.7, the M 135/3.5, the M 200/4. Most of > those, with the exception of the overpriced pancake lens, can be found > for less than $100, and all of them are very sharp and very compact. The > sharpness of the M 200/4 continues to amaze me, and this is a lens that > can usually be had for around $60. It's also one of the most (if not the > most) compact 200s on the planet. For that reason alone, I use it > extensively. > Paul > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
