I've heard (read) over and over that the 40/2.8 is an overpriced mutt, but I've never seen any photos attributed to it that make me say "Ick". Anyone know how it got such a lousy reputation?
Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul wrote: >I got some nice shots with the >40/2.8 and was quite surprised by the quality of the resulting film. >It's probably not quite as sharp as the 35/2, but it's definitely not a >bow-wow. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
