Here I am thinking..."How did I miss that?" and suddenly remembered not renewing my subscription - duh!
Is that review online...and is it worth reading? -- Best regards, Bruce Monday, December 22, 2008, 4:39:15 PM, you wrote: KW> FWIW the Jan 09 issue of Popular Photography has a review of the Lumix DMC - KW> G1. KW> Kenneth Waller KW> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f KW> ----- Original Message ----- KW> From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[email protected]> KW> Subject: Re: testing the G1 ... KW> On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Margus Männik wrote: >> The viewfinder and TFT-screen both do have 480000 /color /image pixels. >> Still, it's best EVF I've seen so far. KW> Re-read several reviews. That does seem to be the case ... the words KW> "effective" 1,440,000 pixels with the field sequential system means KW> 480,000 in R, G and B. It's re-using the same locations for each color KW> in sequence, so total resolution is 1/3 that effective number. That KW> drops it down to an 800x600 pixel display. Still darn good, although KW> not quite the 1400x1050 that one review spoke of. KW> Doesn't matter really. I find it a good, sharp display, very easy to KW> focus and view with. Better than any of the optical pentamirror KW> viewfinders for my eyes: sharper, brighter and larger. KW> Godfrey KW> -- KW> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List KW> [email protected] KW> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net KW> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
