About the EVF - unfortunately no, it is NOT true 1.44Mpix. The viewfinder and TFT-screen both do have 480000 /color /image pixels. Still, it's best EVF I've seen so far.
Your comments seem contrary to all the literature written thus far about the G1.
I haven't used the 14-45 lens very much, but what I have seen from it demonstrates excellent sharpness and contrast, good imaging qualities. I don't have the 45-200 so have no opinion about that one.
Godfrey On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
Generally, I liked the camera, but the price... I tested Lumix G1 with both lenses it has (14-45 and 45-200) together with Pentax K-m double lens kit. G1 with 2 lenses costs ~990EUR here , K-m double lens kit is available at 500EUR and generally it does every trick that G1 knows (except LiveView that I still consider useless crap). Pentax has better high ISO performance, more real resolution (detail solving ability) and better handling (at least). Also, while Pentax DA L 50-200 is surprisingly capable lens, Lumix G 45-200 results are rather soft.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
