Me to had the non macro version. I lost a lot of stuff at sea. This
lens is not among the things I miss.
Mine was a poor performer in almost every meaning of the word.
Probable sample variations.

Thenew  macro version has a better reputation.

-- 
MaritimTim

2009/2/18 Tomek Machnik <[email protected]>:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Saw an ad on CL for a Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC SLD ELD Aspherical
>> Macro Lens for Pentax and Samsung Digital SLR Cameras (581109)
>>
>> I don't remember seeing much mention of this lens in the "normal
>> zoom" discusions. What's it like?
>
> I am using the older, non-macro on a DS (as in  Dark Side). It's a
> very good lens. Compact, light, sharp and behaving very well against
> strong backlight.
> The only thing I might miss is the HSM/whateversonic AF drive.
> The newer, macro version is said to be even better glass-wise.
>
> But I might be just lucky with my sample - I also have first hand
> experience with Sigma's inconsistent quality (recent example: the
> 50-150/2.8 plus a long story with Sigma's useless, rude and
> incompetent official dealer/importer/service center here in Poland ).
>
> tm

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to