Have to know what you plan to shoot, don't we?
Any lenses you can get rid of if you get the 60-250?
Do you need the 250mm end? The 60-250 seems (to me) to be a better,
sharper lens than the 50-135. But it's heavier, bigger, costs a lot.
BUT, are the prices going to rise as they have in Europe? I bought
mine now because of that, instead of ordering the K-7 last weekend. I
already have 2 K20s, and a K10 (and a K100), and I'm selling all of
those except one K20 to pay for my 60-250, and get a start on the K-7
body.
Your situation will vary. Just some thoughts to help you along.
On Jul 9, 2009, at 08:16 , Doug Brewer wrote:
so I'm looking at either the DA Star 50-135mm F2.8 ED (IF) SDM or
the DA Star 60-250mm F4 ED (IF) SDM and the prices are way
different, 500 smackers worth at B&H. Is the 60-250 really that much
better, and keep in mind that linear thought and I rarely collide.
For the difference, I could also get the 21Ltd and a grip for the K-7.
What to do, what to do?
Joseph McAllister
[email protected]
“ It is still true, as was first said many years ago, that people are
the only sophisticated computing devices that can be made at low cost
by unskilled workers!”
— Martin G. Wolf, PhD
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
