Reading the specs it seems to me the migration has already
occurred...and in the opposite direction; that is, K-7 technology has
migrated to the 645D.
While Canikon normally trickle down their techie goodies from their
$8k bodies down to their $1k bodies, Pentax has decided to think
differently, as they always do.
Good? Bad? Who knows... Oh, wait, Ken knows, and it's bad! :-D
Hopefully next time around us little guys will inherit some awesome
technology from the big brother.
--M.
--
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 10 March 2010 22:03, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 8:45 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:10:33AM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>> The 645D is still way out of my price bracket, and they really do need
>>> a step somewhere between a $1000 camera and a $10,000 camera :)
>>> But I'm thinking that some of the technology developed for the 645D -
>>> 77-segment multi-pattern metering, new AF, new image engine - will
>>> migrate nicely to a 35mm-FF DSLR.
>>
>> not to mention migrating nicely _from_ an APS-C DSLR :-)
>>
>> Isn't the metering the same as in the K-7?
>>
> Yep. And that means it's very good.
> Paul
>>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
