Thanks for your thoughts, Mark. If the info was useful to anyone, great. Immediately apparent it wasn't to my point.
Jack --- On Mon, 4/5/10, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mark Roberts <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Define "blown out" :-) > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, April 5, 2010, 5:01 PM > Brian Walters wrote: > > >On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:24 -0700, "Jack Davis" <[email protected]> > >wrote: > >> I gave my honest reaction to the crude first half > dozen words of your > >> first sentence. I read no further nor do I intend > to. > >> You're obviously still stinging from the dressing > down you receive some > >> time ago. > > > >Geez - I'll have to pay better attention. Must > have missed that one. > > > >:-)> > > > >FWIW, I though Godders' original reply was > informative. Maybe not what > >you were looking for but I got some good value out of > it. > > I'll second that. I thought Godfrey's answer was right on > the money. > > All I'd add would be that it's best to start with a good > quality > monitor: I've found if a monitor isn't good quality then > profiling it > is minimally helpful. You can improve shadow or highlight > detail a > *little* through a profile, but not much. Better a > top-notch monitor > without calibration/profiling than a TN monitor with > calibration and > profiling in my experience. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
