On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Joseph McAllister <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 5, 2010, at 14:36 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Well the conversation went on for several posts and finally I invited >>> posters to define what they consider a "blown out" image. IOW, how >>> featureless must the image be to meet your criteria of "blown out." >>> Thought it might explain why the disparity of opinions beyond the >>> monitor's contribution. >> >> And I gave you a precise answer ... said yet another way, "An image is >> 'blown out' when the detail you are trying to retain is no longer >> visible." >> >> It's a testament to your inability to articulate an intelligible >> question if you don't understand what I said. But of course, you >> probably don't want to learn or read anything that disagrees with your >> nebulous notions. > > > Another Lude, Sir Godfrey?
Ask Jack. He's the jerk on drugs. -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
