On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > Well the conversation went on for several posts and finally I invited posters > to define what they consider a "blown out" image. IOW, how featureless must > the image be to meet your criteria of "blown out." > Thought it might explain why the disparity of opinions beyond the monitor's > contribution.
And I gave you a precise answer ... said yet another way, "An image is 'blown out' when the detail you are trying to retain is no longer visible." It's a testament to your inability to articulate an intelligible question if you don't understand what I said. But of course, you probably don't want to learn or read anything that disagrees with your nebulous notions. -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
