On Apr 5, 2010, at 14:36 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
Well the conversation went on for several posts and finally I
invited posters to define what they consider a "blown out" image.
IOW, how featureless must the image be to meet your criteria of
"blown out."
Thought it might explain why the disparity of opinions beyond the
monitor's contribution.
And I gave you a precise answer ... said yet another way, "An image is
'blown out' when the detail you are trying to retain is no longer
visible."
It's a testament to your inability to articulate an intelligible
question if you don't understand what I said. But of course, you
probably don't want to learn or read anything that disagrees with your
nebulous notions.
Another Lude, Sir Godfrey?
Joseph McAllister
Pentaxian
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
