On 4/12/2010 11:44 AM, Tanya Love wrote:
Weeeeeell, in a dream world, I would be able to get myself an ultra sharp
100mm, f1.8 macro that is small and light, and has beautiful bokeh...
...but, we *are* talking Pentax here, so erm, there are few things that they
bring out that are "ideal" (as much as I love them!).
I tend to agree with you here though Bruce. I think that I will have more
versatility with the 100mm, and I really have been needing a decent macro
lens for ages.
If only it was f1.8 instead of 2.8!! Oh well, it'll suffice I guess, I just
wish that those damn babies would sit still in low light! Lol.
Decision made - the 100mm it is!
Consider myself.... enabled!
Just to confuse matters, I've been having a wonderful time using Sasha's
tamron 90/2.8. I haven't used the pentax 100/2.8 but I like the images
from the tamron better than with my Pentax DFA 50/2.8.
I've been running up against the minimum focus distance on my DA40,
hence my question about the DA35 macro a while back. Has anyone tried
using a Raynox 250 on a DA40?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
