Tanya. I have both, but don't use either as much as i should.
I like my 77 ltd, and my 100 f2.8 is hit and miss for me. Not sure if sending it in with my K10D to have them adjust to the 100 would help or not. My images are not as sharp as others i have seen. I do have the DA F 50 f2.8 macro which i really like. Not quite the FL your look at but nice and sharp Dave On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Tanya Love <tanyal...@bigpond.com> wrote: > > fa 100mm f2.8 macro or fa 77m f1.8 ltd > > trying to decide between the two as I can’t afford both – do I want a > faster, smaller limited lens or a slower, larger lens with macro? > > I don’t have a macro lens that I am happy with, BUT I really am loving using > my fa 50mm f1.7 as a “leave on the body all the time” lens right now, and am > thinking that the FA77mm would be awesome for this purpose with just a bit > more reach for portraits. > > > However, not sure if I would like the 0.7m minimum focus of the 77mm. > > Decisions, decisions! What are your thoughts guys and gals? > > t.x. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
