On Apr 28, 2010, at 12:13 PM, William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "P N Stenquist" > Subject: Re: K-7 replacement? > > > >> But the Samsung sensor in your K20 doesn't produce the same results as the >> sensor in the K7. Far from it. > > What big differences are you seeing? > My thoughts are that the K7 rendering is a slight bit warmer, which is > probably more software than hardware, but that's about it. > I don't feel really comfortable taking the K7 over ISO 640, which was also > where I started seeing unacceptable noise off the K20. >
K7 exposure is far more accurate than the K20's, the dynamic range seems about a stop better, and noise is improved as well. The deer pics I showed the other day were ISO 800. My pic in the PDML annual is at ISO 3200. I got decent results at the pool tournament shooting 6400. K7 noise level isn't as good as Kx, but it's somewhat better than K20. Paul PS: When you first got your K7, you noted all these improvements and praised the k7 effusively. If I had time I'd look it up in the archive. So I suspect you're just being argumentative now. Of course you wouldn't do that:-)). Paul > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
