Tom,

Great advice and picture.  The shop owner echoed your feelings.  He
said he was comfortable taking the 645 anywhere, but not the 67II.  He
said that working from a car or studio - not really walking anywhere,
the 67 is the way to go, but the portability and ease of use of the
645 can't be beat.

Other Tom (who is set on a 67II and hasn't tried a 645n), don't try
the 645n or you may be in the same quandry as me.  I have got to do
some thinking, studying and shopping.


Bruce Dayton



Saturday, January 26, 2002, 3:41:13 PM, you wrote:

tbc> Bruce said:
>> 
>> So, for the price difference, and mobility, any wisdom from the list
>> as to considering one over the other?  I can say that all MF shots had
>> it all over the 35mm stuff.  I really would like to go in that
>> direction, just trying to figure it out.

tbc> Image size aside, they're really very different cameras. Buy the one 
tbc> that feels best to you. 

tbc> You should only buy into the bigger is better argument if you plan on 
tbc> printing larger than 11x14. I don't think you'll see much of a 
tbc> difference otherwise. 

tbc> Want autofocus?

tbc> Want data imprinting?

tbc> Want interchangeable finders?

tbc> Want motor drive?

tbc> Want a fisheye or shift?

tbc> Want a macro lens that goes to 1:1?

tbc> How much weight do you feel like dragging around?

tbc> I love the way the 645n feels, and I love the prints I get from 645 
tbc> negs. The 645n is just small enough for me to use as a walking around 
tbc> camera. A 67II would be too big - I know I'd leave it at home a lot. 

tbc> Here's a "walking around" shot I took recently:

tbc> http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/pow/

tbc> We could debate whether it would be a better shot if it were shot on 
tbc> 6x7, but the simple fact is I wouldn't have dragged a Pentax 67 
tbc> around for this shot. I *would* drag a Mamiya 7 around, but that's 
tbc> another debate....

tbc> This is from the photo outing Geoff Moes and I took. I carried the 
tbc> 645n and 45-85 in my hand for over an hour.

tbc> Anyway, my own feeling is that the 645n is more suitable for someone 
tbc> who does more handheld work and likes the way 35mm cameras feel, 
tbc> while the 67II is great for folks who like to work off a tripod and 
tbc> are trying to squeeze out every bit of resolution without resorting 
tbc> to a view camera.

tbc> 6x4.5 negs look great and they'd probably make you pretty damned 
tbc> happy.

tbc> 6x7 negs look slightly better at big enlargements and would make you 
tbc> pretty damned happy too.

tbc> Buy the camera you like!

tbc> tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to