Yeah but, realistically, a 645N is a more practical camera for 90% of photographers. It's a better compromise, much easier to handle, and is more able to serve as an only or all-purpose camera.
But isn't there a new one on the way? --Mike > I ask myself as follows: > > Q: "What is the reason I want to move up to medium format?". > A: "To reap all the benefits of a larger film size." > > Q: "Any other reason?" > A: "Nope." > > Q: "It sure would be nice to have the AF and other nice features of the > 645N, wouldn't it?" > A: "Yep." > > Q: "But that isn't why you want to move up to medium format is it?" > A: "Nope". > > Q: "And a 6x7 image has a 60% greater image size doesn't it?" > A: "Yep." > > Q: "Isn't that THE reason why you want medium format, a larger image?" > A: "Yep." > > I always end up agreeing with myself in the end, that a 67II is the way for > me. Especially considering availability of used lenses. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
