That is great to hear! I have found the 135 to be a tad long on the
K-x, but now you've got me super curious about it on the K1000.
Suddenly, I feel like a real-live Pentaxian!
-- Walt
On 11/27/2010 8:24 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
This is so cool. M50 and 135 f/2.5 were my two main lenses the whole time I was in high
school (1979-1983). It's a stellar set for film... and just a shade long (for me) in the
1.5 "crop factor" digital days.
Solid performers, both. And extraordinarily expensive, even in these days of
overpriced Pentax everything.
I've since moved up to the FA50 f/1.7 so I can have it AF for me. But have yet
to find an affordable alternative to the 135 f/2.5 which I still use on a
regular basis.
-Charles
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
