On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Nick David Wright wrote: > An image editor for me doesn't have to be fancy. I'm really, honestly, > mostly happy with iPhoto.
It' not a matter of being fancy. It's about being able to control factors like midrange contrast, color temperature and those white and black points. While iPhoto is much better than it used to be, it can only limit you in comparison to even an inexpensive rendering tool like PhotoShop Elements. Paul > > But I've really come to like the curves control. And I miss unsharp > mask. iPhoto and Aperture only have "sharpen." > > I like the sound of that program called Pixelmator. > http://www.pixelmator.com/ Has anyone ever used it? > > Has everything I'd need. I would just have to upgrade my version of OSX. > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:56 PM, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Some day soon I'll have to plunk down for a real photo editor. >>> Actually, I've been playing with a trial version of Aperture the last >>> couple days and I find I really like it. >> >> as an old prepress/Photoshop jockey, i've found Aperture 3 very much good >> enough for cataloging and rendering photos; i think Lightroom has the edge >> in some areas, but there's not enough difference for me to switch; but PSE >> is in some respects more of a "photo editor" than Aperture or Lightroom (the >> difference being rendering versus editing), depending on what you meant when >> you wrote that > > -- > ~Nick David Wright > http://www.nickdavidwright.net/ > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
