I can't remember if I have 8 or 9. If your images don't need too terrible much tweaking it really does pretty well.
Its the only reason I haven't put down the money for PS Elements, 90% of the time I can get what I want with iPhoto. On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:15 PM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll have to give it a try. I haven't done so in a long time, but I have the > ilife 08 version. > Paul > > On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:50 PM, Nick David Wright wrote: > >> iPhoto has levels control just like Photoshop, though it doesn't allow >> quite as fine control I think. It also does color temp. There's not >> much else you need. >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:45 PM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Nick David Wright wrote: >>> >>>> An image editor for me doesn't have to be fancy. I'm really, honestly, >>>> mostly happy with iPhoto. >>> >>> It' not a matter of being fancy. It's about being able to control factors >>> like midrange contrast, color temperature and those white and black points. >>> While iPhoto is much better than it used to be, it can only limit you in >>> comparison to even an inexpensive rendering tool like PhotoShop Elements. >>> Paul >>> >>>> >>>> But I've really come to like the curves control. And I miss unsharp >>>> mask. iPhoto and Aperture only have "sharpen." >>>> >>>> I like the sound of that program called Pixelmator. >>>> http://www.pixelmator.com/ Has anyone ever used it? >>>> >>>> Has everything I'd need. I would just have to upgrade my version of OSX. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:56 PM, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Some day soon I'll have to plunk down for a real photo editor. >>>>>> Actually, I've been playing with a trial version of Aperture the last >>>>>> couple days and I find I really like it. >>>>> >>>>> as an old prepress/Photoshop jockey, i've found Aperture 3 very much good >>>>> enough for cataloging and rendering photos; i think Lightroom has the edge >>>>> in some areas, but there's not enough difference for me to switch; but PSE >>>>> is in some respects more of a "photo editor" than Aperture or Lightroom >>>>> (the >>>>> difference being rendering versus editing), depending on what you meant >>>>> when >>>>> you wrote that >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ~Nick David Wright >>>> http://www.nickdavidwright.net/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>> follow the directions. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ~Nick David Wright >> http://www.nickdavidwright.net/ >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- ~Nick David Wright http://www.nickdavidwright.net/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
