My impression has been that, when POCKing (Photos Of Cute Kids), budget is of 
no concern. No direct experience myself. 

stan

On Jan 11, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:

> Actually, with less than that kit budget Christine could probably afford to 
> hire contractors to install much brighter lighting in the gymnasium. :-)
> 
> -bmw
> 
> On 11-01-11 6:06 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>> Wow, Stan, another K7, two K5's, a couple of fast primes and the
>> 50-135.  Would you mind talking to my spouse sometime?  I just can't
>> make it sound this reasonable.
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Stan Halpin
>> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>>> If you want fast, there is always the PK-A 50/1.2 . . .
>>> 
>>> My vote:
>>> a. Stick with what you have for a meet or two. Even better, take a bunch of 
>>> photos at practice sessions; if experiments don't work out, it won't be 
>>> quite as painful as missing out on a great shot during competition. 
>>> Evaluate what focal length(s) you are most often using. Play with the 
>>> processing. Think about the output media (are these for wall-sized prints? 
>>> 4x6's for the grandparents? viewing on a PC?) and how much sharpness etc 
>>> you really need.
>>> b. Then -
>>>        1. go with one or two fast primes. Wider is better, you can always 
>>> crop later.
>>>                1.1 If you decide to go with two primes, buy a second K-7.
>>>        2. after 6 months, then buy the K-5 (or two of them).
>>>                2.1 Keep one of the K-7's as a backup, mount your 50-135 on 
>>> it . . .
>>> 
>>> stan
>>> 
>>> On Jan 10, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Aside from a 50 1.4, which is substantially faster than your 50-135 but 
>>>>> not long enough for the most part, anything faster than the lens you're 
>>>>> using would have to be a prime, and an expensive one at that. And  you 
>>>>> won't have the flexibility that a zoom gives you for this type of work. 
>>>>> The 50-135 is an excellent and relatively fast lens. Go for the K-5.
>>>>> Paul
>>>> I got to play with the 50/1.4 a couple of months ago, when the Pentax
>>>> road show came to town.  I've never shot with anything that fast, and
>>>> it was *amazing*.  I think you're right that the zoom is better for
>>>> this situation, but that one is still on my wish list.
>>>> 
>>>> Along with a k-5.
>>>> 
>>>> And an upgrade to cs5.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your input, Paul. ( I noticed you voted twice, but I can
>>>> only count it once...  ;)  )
>>>> 
>>>> -c
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>> follow the directions.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to