On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 03:48:27PM -0500, John Sessoms wrote: > [Re: FA 28-105 zooms]
> I think I'd actually rather have one of the IF versions over the PZ > version. How do opinions go comparing the 3.2-4.5 vs 4-5.6? Godfrey reckoned that the 3.2-4.5 was at least as good, optically, as the original PZ 4-5.6 (and both were superior to the non-PZ one). The PZ 28-105 was (and still is) my standard everyday lens on the *ist-D. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
