LOL. I think a combination of primes will always have an optical advantage and an operational disadvantage compared to zooms. All zooms suck? Not anymore. Too many zooms produce images that are excellent to well within a normal range of expectations and use. For some, there is never "sharp enough" or "bokehlicious enough" to make any lens really exceptional.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Krisjanis Linkevics <krisjanis.linkev...@exigenservices.com> wrote: > >> As for the lens itself, it isn't very fast to AF but optically this is >> a pure gem. And yes, not very discrete lens, hood is huge :) >> I wouldn't sell mine for all the tea in China ;) >> >> Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs > > [LBA seeking...] > [Match found "optically this is a pure gem"] > [Target acquired "50-135"] > [Commence operation] > > [failure!failure!failure! FUD overload, auto-response "zooms suck"] > > Now the real question is if this gem really is shinier than the combination > of FA43 ltd/FA77 ltd/DFA100/FA135 I already have :) > > [LBA waiting for input...] > > kris > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
