On 11-09-10 7:24 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,

As you can see, I've adopted a minimalist image titling convention. It simplifies things.

Aside from that, having packed up and shipped off my K-x to have the viewfinder glass (hopefully) replaced (hopefully) under warranty, I broke out the K100D Super that Mr. Larry Colen so graciously loaned to me while I was out visiting in his eminently beautiful state.

I threw the old Tokina SZ-X 28-200 f/3.5-5.3 on there and fired off a few shots to see what it can do. I've shot maybe a total of 5 shots on that lens before, just to see if there was anything wrong with it. I have to say, I don't know why I haven't used it more. I'm extremely surprised at how sharp the thing is. Considering I got it in a bunch of about 5 lenses for which I paid a total of $100, I'm extremely pleased with it.

http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/6134029469/
ISO 800, f/4.5, 1/500, Av

Yes, the background is a bit desaturated, and I know some (most?) aren't fond of that sort of gimmickry. But, I'm a contrarian.

I like it a lot, Walt. I also like the background texture/grain in that. Did you add that in PP?



In any event, comments and critiques are welcome -- even if it's just to bitch about the desaturation. I was just so pleasantly surprised with the sharpness that I had to share. Also, I'm pleasantly surprised with the noise at ISO 800 on the K100D Super. I was expecting much more than is there. Thanks, Larry!

-- Walt

Heh. Work with ISO 1600 and especially 3200 for a while. You'll see noise all right.

-bmw

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to